Chair Of The Darbon Institute Says Female Genital Mutilation Laws Fail To Deliver Justice
Jonathan Meddings argues for a more comprehensive approach towards all non-consensual genital cutting.
In a critique of Australia's female genital mutilation (FGM) laws, Jonathan Meddings, Chair of The Darbon Institute, argues that the current legal framework is ineffective in combating the practice. Despite criminalizing FGM across all Australian states and territories, only one successful prosecution has been recorded, leaving an estimated 53,000 women living in Australia who have been subjected to FGM.
Meddings emphasizes that the problem lies not with the existence of criminal laws, but with a response that relies solely on them. He contends that the non-consensual, medically unnecessary genital cutting of children will persist as long as it remains socially and legally permissible. "The solution lies in acknowledging that... change can only be achieved through widespread understanding of the harms of these practices," Meddings asserts.
To address this issue comprehensively, Meddings proposes the introduction of civil laws that prohibit all forms of non-consensual, medically deferrable genital cutting on children, irrespective of their sex or gender. He advocates for a combination of legislative measures, regulatory frameworks, public education campaigns, and support for survivors.
Meddings highlights the need for an inclusive approach, stating, "Her body, her choice. His body, his choice. Their body, their choice. It's that simple."